Noteworthy Articles

The following is a sample of William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review articles cited in recent court decisions:

Federal Circuit Courts

Gregory M. Romano, Note, Shovels First and Lawyers Later: A Collision Course for CERCLA Cleanups and Environmental Tort Claims, 21 WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL’Y REV. 421, 428 (1997), cited in New Mexico v. GE, 467 F.3d 1223 (10th Cir. 2006).

Karyn M. Schmidt, Rohm & Haas Was Right: Recovery of Government Oversight Costs in Private Party Response Actions, 19 WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL’Y REV. 253 (1995), cited in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. American Airlines, 98 F.3d 564 (10th Cir. 1996).

Federal District Courts

Prof. Dr. Michael G. Faure and Dr. Tom Vanden Borre, Compensating Nuclear Damage: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S. and International Liability Schemes, 33 WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL’Y REV. 219, 220-221 (2008), cited in Whittaker Corp. v. Am. Nuclear Insurers, 671 F. Supp. 2d 242, 248 (D. Mass. 2009).

Stephen Dycus, Osama’s Submarine: National Security and Environmental Protection after 9/11, 30 WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL’Y REV. 1 (2005), cited in NRDC v. Winter, 527 F. Supp. 2d 1216, 1221 (C.D. Cal. 2008).

Lester Brickman, Lawyers’ Ethics and Fiduciary Obligation in the Brave New World of Aggregative Litigation, 26 WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL’Y REV. 243 (2001), cited in In re Zyprexa Prods. Liab. Litig., 424 F. Supp. 2d 488, 494 (E.D.N.Y. 2006).

Gregory M. Romano, Note, Shovels First and Lawyers Later: A Collision Course for CERCLA Cleanups and Environmental Tort Claims, 21 WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL’Y REV. 421, 444-445 (1997), cited in New Mexico v. GE, 335 F. Supp. 2d 1185 (D.N.M. 2004).

Redemann, Robert P. & Michael F. Smith, The Evolution of PRP Standing under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 21 WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL’Y REV. 300 (1997), cited in United States v. Chrysler Corp., 157 F. Supp. 2d 849, 856 (N.D. Ohio 2001).

Mark A. Stach, Only “Innocent” Parties Need Apply: The Death of Private Party Cost Recovery Actions Under Superfund?, 20 WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL’Y REV. 33, 36 (1995), cited in Adhesives Research v. American Inks & Coatings Corp., 931 F. Supp. 1231, 1238 (M.D. Pa. 1996).

State Courts

Jeffrey J. Lamontagne, Note, Oregon’s Wasted Effort: The Supreme Court’s Inability to Adapt its Compensatory Tax Doctrine to Solid Waste Regulations, 19 WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL’Y REV. 345, 360 (1995), cited in Carlson v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Comm’n, 919 P.2d 1337, 1348 (Alaska 1996).

J. Nivala, The Landscape Art of Daniel Urban Kiley, 29 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 267, 322 (2005), cited in People v. Sven, 365 Ill. App. 3d 226, 237 (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. 2006).

Comments are closed.