William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review
Volume 28
Issue 1 | Issue 2| Issue 3
Issue 1
SYMPOSIUM ISSUE I
PESTICIDES: WHAT WILL THE FUTURE REAP?
Articles
Pep Fuller & Thomas O. McGarity, BEYOND THE DIRTY DOZEN: THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION’S CAUTIOUS APPROACH TO LISTING NEW PERSISTENT ORGANIZE POLLUTANTS AND THE FUTURE OF THE STOCKHOLM CONVENTION
Andrew P. Morriss & Roger E. Meiners, MARKET PRINCIPLES FOR PESTICIDES
Notes
Christopher R. Clements, NO BLOOD FOR OIL? UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY, OIL, AND THE ARCTIC WILDLIFE REFUGE
Spencer M. Wiegard, THE BROWNFIELDS ACT: PROVIDING RELIEF FOR THE INNOCENT OR NEW HURDLES TO AVOID CERCLA LIABILITY
Justin W. Stemple, TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT: THE SUPREME COURT’S REGULATORY TAKINGS JURISPRUDENCE AFTER TAHOE-SIERRA
Issue 2
SYMPOSIUM ISSUE II
PESTICIDES: WHAT WILL THE FUTURE REAP?
Articles
Heidi Gorovitz Robertson, HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO TELL YOU?!: EPA’S ONGOING STRUGGLE WITH DATA FROM THIRD-PARTY PESTICIDE TOXICITY STUDIES USING HUMAN SUBJECTS
Kristina Thayer & Jane Houlihan, PESTICIDES, HUMAN HEALTH, AND THE FOOD QUALITY PROTECTION ACT
Sidney A. Shapiro, THE INFORMATION QUALITY ACT AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: THE PERILS OF REFORM BY APPROPRIATIONS RIDER
Michael T. Palmer, THE CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION ACT OF 2000: NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES
Avi Brisman, DOUBLE WHAMMY: COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF CONVICTION AND IMPRISONMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Notes
E. Carter Chandler, LOGGERHEAD TURTLE v. COUNTY COUNCIL: THE FUTURE OF FEE SHIFTING IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION?
Issue 3
Articles
Rober F. Blomquist, IN SEARCH OF THEMIS: TOWARD THE MEANING OF THE IDEAL LEGISLATOR- SENATOR EDMUND S. MUSKIE AND THE EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 1965-1968
Lucia A. Silecchia, ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS FROM THE PERSPECTIVES OF NEPA AND CATHOLIC SOCIAL TEACHING: ECOLOGICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
Essay
Notes
Nate Cihlar, THE NAVY AND LOW FREQUENCY ACTIVE SONAR: STRIPPING THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF ITS AUTHORITY
Ethan Shaner, BALANCING CURRENT AND FUTURE DEMANDS FOR COLORADO RIVER WATER WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT